Do the sins of our opposition wash our own sins clean?
I believe we need an independent organization, like Underwriters Laboratories, to test for the safety of all pharmaceutical products. For many years, the FDA has been compromised due to 45% of its budget coming from the pharmaceutical industry. The FDA no longer advocates for the people of America. It's now an advocate for the pharmaceutical industry, as has become apparent with the Covid drugs.
Sorry, but you cannot use the word "war" to describe the situation and then pretend that all our warriors can and should keep their uniforms spotless. While I agree that it is critical for Dr. Malone to remain exactly what he has been: totally honest, I regard it as moronic to believe that we can win ANY war by having all our warriors act like Dr. Malone.
If we learned nothing else from these past two years, we should have learned that the side that moves the masses wins the war. And NO ONE moves the masses without propaganda. We do not have to tell murderous lies like our enemy but you do have to state your case unequivocally and forcefully, without all the ifs, ands, and buts of an academic. Anyone who thinks otherwise does not know the first damn thing about warfare.
Thank you, Dr. Malone, for another excellent essay. I completely agree with your assessments of both Stew Peters and Alex Jones.
Speaking of information warfare; the 19 year old boyfriend of a friend of ours, who is from Nicaragua, is now in the hospital here in NC, where he was visiting. Since he came in legally, rather than across the southern border, he had to be fully vaccinated. The doctors are saying he has myocarditis from a mild virus he had last week. If his worried parents want to come to check on their ill son, they will have to be jabbed also. Maybe the evil ones can kill off the entire family. I am so angry!
Fighting fire with fire is a human response. Taking a higher road is admirable, and necessary to overcome the crime of the Century.. I would like to see a discussion on the study that indicated a 7.7% adverse reaction rate to those who have been injected, which negates any rationale for getting the injection..
Fully agree with your insights here Dr. Malone...I guess my only point would be the idea of "all publicity is good publicity" in our cause here?
Maybe I'm naive in hoping that those who seek the truth won't throw the baby out with the bathwater on this, and if the sensationalism and obvious fabrications can be taken with a grain of salt, the truths within may be able to reach more people?
That said, ethics/morality must remain central to any future form of society.
I have seen other videos of people dropping over supposedly from the jabs. Some of those people I was rather certain did not receive the jab. one had locked knees and had been standing for quite some time, and she was not of the age that would have been jabbed. Locked knees can cause you to pass out and fall over like a board and that is what this person did. She was some minister or government official in one of the northern Europe countries.
I do think there there are enough examples out there of people we know have been jabbed that you do not need to add questionable images. It defeats the purpose.
Integrity needs to be totally on board.
Only Jesus can wash our sins clean!
Thank you Dr. Malone! Your post goes right to the heart of all that is worth living and dying for, whether in times of COVID or the vagaries of a normal and hidden life. I made my lonely choice a long time ago, but " je ne regrette rien".
“Furthermore, these types of errors become weapons which will be deployed against us by our opponents in this unrestricted information war battlefield.”
This is almost verbatim what I said when expressing concerns about this piece and stating that we need to hold ourselves to the highest standards of integrity and accuracy—not only because our opponents will use errors to discredit the larger message and movement but because it is our integrity and commitment to seeking the truth that distinguishes us from them.
I've come to the conclusion there is an information warfare tactic that is somewhat like a honey trap. A person who seems sincere ("heart in the right place" is often used to describe them) energetically rides forth to do battle, but proclaims things which are easily debunked. People dismiss this as minor flaws, but the real purpose is to fatally undermine the entire battle and any soldiers who have signed up. It's not really controlled opposition - it's more like opposition with hidden land mines. Most distressing is when these individuals cloak themselves in religion. So many people assume if someone says they believe in God or Christ or whatever, they can't possibly be lying and are actually psychopathic.
You are a much better person than I. I see Peters not as a carnival barker but perhaps as someone who is compromised and has been turned into a double agent. A kind of honey trap. But, the person I'm most curious about, though, is Karen Kingston. She has been saying some amazing things - are they true? Has she been suckered into the Peters web, or is she complicit?
I'd like to commend my friend and colleague Robert for speaking the calm complete truth. While it may seem expeditious to use hyperbole as a weapon, but the problem is dishonesty. Tyrants aren't causing our representative governments to abandon us using honest elections and sincere governance structures, but by lies and hyperbole. We can never win a fight permanently using hysterical, thoughtless distortions. They will always be better at that than we are. We only win when it is inconceivable and unsafe to lie and distort the truth.
I am always grateful for Dr. Malone's clarity...
I am, however, a little uncomfortable with the language used to demonize an individual who's heart is unknown to us... I understand Mr Peters made several mistakes in the production, "Died Suddenly", which is incredibly unfortunate for this entire effort... However, Dr. Malone himself acknowledged that he, too, made such a mistake early in this "movement", and I would have been just as put off had someone referred to him as a "carnival barker"....
We must respect all even though we vociferously disagree.
I haven't yet read the commentary you have cited, but I did watch the documentary, "Died Suddenly." I agree that one should judge it apart from any feelings one has about Stew Peters. I have read a lot of personal attacks on him as a way to discredit the film. Clearly, there are a few errors, but I do not believe they were intentional (looking at hours of video clips can lead to errors, God knows there are many videos of people dying suddenly so it isn't necessary to pad the record). In any case, I am very happy that more than 6 million people ( last time I looked) have watched the film, because,overall, I believe it raises awareness of what is clearly a public health disaster the scope and lasting consequences of which we are only beginning to understand. As far as what is "new" in the film, there are many things that will new to people who don't subscribe to this substack and others (I also subscribe to Kirsch's substack) . What has gotten very little attention outside of podcasts like Peters's are the large, white, rubbery, fibrous material that embalmers are finding the likes of which they have never seen before. No other documentary has included such detail as well as video and photographic evidence of such material. Even though I have followed the coverage of such clots I never realized that so many embalmers were on the same page about this. There is a dimension of the COVID "vaccine" harms that many leaders of the health freedom movement have declined to discuss. The abnormalities in the blood of vaccine-injured people such as the blood rouleaux, contaminants in the vials (from stainless steel to graphene oxide) as well as the aforementioned clotting material. In my humble opinion, we should all be calling for thorough investigations of the vial contents of ALL COVID vaccines, as well as autopsies on those who have died suddenly, of the sort Dr. Michael Mörz carried out (in Germany) on the elderly man. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/10/1651 If the Peters documentary, which is quite skillfully done, can save lives by alerting people to the dangers then I thank him from the bottom of my impure heart. Why impure? Because, no one is perfect no one is pure, "Died Suddenly" is an impressive piece of work. https://www.rt.com/russia/567231-belarusian-foreign-minister-dies-at-64/ The criminal enterprise continues.
We should keep in mind that the truth is independent of the speaker. If the author is the most reprehensible human who ever lived, but speaks the truth, then the source doesn't matter, unless its to reconsider the possibility of redemption. Conversely, if the most highly respected media speaks lies, the liecstands on its own, with the side effect of undermining the reputation of that source.
Reviews of statements like Died Suddenly must be based on the material, not the presenter. Doing otherwise is how propaganda works. If there are inaccuracies, seek clarification, not revenge.
We must also remember that information war is war, and just a tactical decision away from violence. Maintaining peacetime principles in war may feel noble, but is also defeatist. When you lose the war with your principles intact, you still lose, possibly fatally. Wars are always ugly affairs, bringing out the worst aspects of human nature. But the only rational basis for engaging in war is to win. If that's not the objective, better to surrender immediately and hope for mercy. Your principles won't survive, but maybe you will. If you win, by any means necessary, you can restore your principles when its over.
We give medals to the most vicious fighters. Perhaps Malone and Peters will both deserve one. Both are likely to contribute to victory.
I've followed your work on covid from nearly the beginning, and I've shared your writings and posts with many people. Do you know what some of the feedback has been? "He works with the CIA. He's a fed and can't be trusted." Therefore it puzzles me when you attack Peters based on his life but forget that we often ignore your own, in good faith. And you attack him personally in this article.... but do you know what's missing? You do not address the work at all. Do you know how many of us have been watching the past two years and a day doesn't go by without someone having "died suddenly" in their 20's and 30's? But you merely relate a single instance that you shared where someone was assessed as having died suddenly before vaccine rollout. What about the dozens and hundreds of others we are seeing monthly and annually? And now the news is full of morticians from around the world OVERWHELMED by the amount of people with long thick blood clots coming in. But do you address this at all? No, not a word.
Overall, you should have given a much more thorough response than this. It is very inadequate given the fact that we are being bombarded with people dying suddenly and reports of long fibrous blood clots from embalmers, yet you address neither, and brush them off so easily. To me, that seems odd and possibly suspicious. Please research and address these topics and clear the air. Thank you.