Duplicitous, deceitful, furtive and uncooperative to the greatest degree possible. A prime example of a man who leads by intimidation then conveniently does so in a way to implicate others. A swamp creature who has perfected the art of slime over a 38+ year period.
If you don't even read the questions and just scroll through Fauci's answers they are nothing more than denials, and "I don't, recall, I don't know," etc. The man's brain is apparently empty.
There are a few key points that I don't think were addressed:
1) Some virologist testified at a Senate hearing a while back (and I don't have the exact details) that this was very unlikely a natural evolution and more likely man made. He was referring to the differences between the closest bat strain to the wuhan strain as having multiple amino acids in a row without losing anything from the original.
2) That positive sense RNA viruses have always had two main traits when a vaccine is made: Autoimmune disease and ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement). The ADE is key here in that the vaccine manufacturers and the government have been saying "you will get a lesser case" when the expectation is that everyone would get a worse case when getting vaccinated with a Wuhan strain during Omicron times.
3) Never vaccinate during a pandemic - WHO 2019 pandemic playbook. (you get more strains).
4) Herd immunity was never possible with this vaccine.
5) A zoonontic diseases like this can never be eradicated like smallpox or measles.
6) Fauci was included on an email where research on Cloriquine was successfully used to fight Covid. It theorized that the less potent HCQ would be as effective.
7) Asymptomatic spread was based on two things: A story of a German woman that said she was not infected who later changed her story and a computer model study that assumed a percentage of asymptomatic spread. These were the basis for all other studies and reasons for healthy people being quarantined and masked assuming that they could kill someone because they were infected and didn't know it. Asymptomatic people don't drive pandemics.
8) Mask studies have shown less than 2% difference in infection rates (within the error rates). The CDC had one annecdote that they used with two hair dressers to explain that masking worked. It was not based on science and you could have made the same argument with the color of their underwear being the factor that stopped transmission. I don't think there are any real life studies (using dust in a lab isn't real life) that prove the effectiveness of masks for healthy people.
Transcribed Deposition of DR. ANTHONY FAUCI -
Fauci replied with "I do not recall" 176 times.
Thanks for putting this out there! The more eyeballs on this slimebag the better.
Fauci was always disposable. The question is who's being set up as the next Fauci.
How can a person effectively head up a critical agency having to do with public health and have such poor recall of pertinent conversations?
Answer #1: He can't!
Answer #2: He can lie.
It’s how 100% of tyrants testify.
God bless you Doc for your vigilance in keeping us all informed! 🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻
Give our love to Senator Ron Johnson. Sounds like a great schedule.
Sounds like a Mafiosa testifying. Obfuscation.
This guy has such a bad memory, it is no wonder that he could not remember
- that Vitamin D was shown clearly to be protective against the respiratory diseases of cold and flu by the late 1930s,
- his own words that natural immunity was superior to any vaccine induced immunity
- what constitutes gain of function research
- that it is unlikely an injection in the sterile bodily immune system will protect from mucosal immune system infection and transmission
- that if you can smell a fart, you can probably be infected with an airborne virus through a mask
Duplicitous, deceitful, furtive and uncooperative to the greatest degree possible. A prime example of a man who leads by intimidation then conveniently does so in a way to implicate others. A swamp creature who has perfected the art of slime over a 38+ year period.
Started reading it. Can't fight the feeling that it's a Babylon Bee write up.
Fauci must have dementia. Reminds me of a clone of Napolean.
If you don't even read the questions and just scroll through Fauci's answers they are nothing more than denials, and "I don't, recall, I don't know," etc. The man's brain is apparently empty.
I bet 200 years in prison would help him remember...
There are a few key points that I don't think were addressed:
1) Some virologist testified at a Senate hearing a while back (and I don't have the exact details) that this was very unlikely a natural evolution and more likely man made. He was referring to the differences between the closest bat strain to the wuhan strain as having multiple amino acids in a row without losing anything from the original.
https://nypost.com/2021/05/29/explosive-study-claims-to-prove-chinese-scientists-created-covid/
2) That positive sense RNA viruses have always had two main traits when a vaccine is made: Autoimmune disease and ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement). The ADE is key here in that the vaccine manufacturers and the government have been saying "you will get a lesser case" when the expectation is that everyone would get a worse case when getting vaccinated with a Wuhan strain during Omicron times.
3) Never vaccinate during a pandemic - WHO 2019 pandemic playbook. (you get more strains).
4) Herd immunity was never possible with this vaccine.
5) A zoonontic diseases like this can never be eradicated like smallpox or measles.
6) Fauci was included on an email where research on Cloriquine was successfully used to fight Covid. It theorized that the less potent HCQ would be as effective.
7) Asymptomatic spread was based on two things: A story of a German woman that said she was not infected who later changed her story and a computer model study that assumed a percentage of asymptomatic spread. These were the basis for all other studies and reasons for healthy people being quarantined and masked assuming that they could kill someone because they were infected and didn't know it. Asymptomatic people don't drive pandemics.
8) Mask studies have shown less than 2% difference in infection rates (within the error rates). The CDC had one annecdote that they used with two hair dressers to explain that masking worked. It was not based on science and you could have made the same argument with the color of their underwear being the factor that stopped transmission. I don't think there are any real life studies (using dust in a lab isn't real life) that prove the effectiveness of masks for healthy people.
Page 46 says so much about who he thinks he is! VERY IMPORTANT PERSON!