"In order to have a meaningful mass awakening, the content of the awakening must be defined and distributed to the members of humanity, thus immunizing them against parasitic mind control. Because this content must be spiritual, the involvement of religion is unavoidable." He says it so well. Either we accept the greater reality of God, or the elite god-men will control everyone else.
This seemed like a systems analysis view of the world. Tech system vs. spiritual system. But I see life as more of a human organizational problem. A small percentage of humans are just different and cause problems for the majority. They are insatiable and would consume and/or own the entire planet if there were no constraints. They enjoy dominating and controlling others - even owning others. Obtaining monopoly power is the game. Unless we can figure out a way to keep these people from positions where they can gain control and harm others, we will continually find ourselves returning to this environment.
Catherine Austin Fitts of Solari envisions developing decentralized, local alternatives.I find that very appealing, but I don't see how it will withstand the war that will be brought against it. I think the author is correct that some kind of alternative cognitive mass awakening is required, but how? Mass non-compliance is the only chance but I can't see it happening. I almost think if you really got through to people that the next step is slavery, most of them would sign up willingly. I just read India has 92% of its population under the digital ID system. I'm sure China is already there and there isn't much resistance happening in the US. Information has been weaponized and so many people are simply not curious. They are just sponges soaking up whatever they're fed.
Homeland Security isn’t doing anything without Brandon puppeteers approval. It is being directed from the top. This Nation has been sold out by traitors throughout our Government.
A few years ago I read a "transhumanist" novel. I immediately recognized two things: first, transhumanists are males in an arrested state of development with a maturation level of about 15. This has nothing to do with intelligence, and everything to do with maturity. Second, no woman who is or has been a mother could ever do anything but laugh at the idiocy that is transhumanism. Transhumanism requires that the practitioner have absolutely no empathy, and a little boy's love of cool gadgets. That is it. The end.
The duality of centralized control in the hands of elites vs. decentralized democratic humanistic political organization seems to me to be as old as civilization. Same oppressor beast, dressed up now in techno clothing. Same fearful subservient and misinformed populace, now made so through censorship as opposed to by lack of education. I think it is reflective of an irresolvable conundrum of politics: give too much power to the elites and the power will go to their heads and they will become oppressors; give too much power to the people and they will make decisions out of ignorance, lack of experience and become disordered -- a kind of ochlocracy of the ignorant.
The Remains Of The Day, with Anthony Hopkins is a movie that explores this dichotomy: showing the folly of both the elites and the incompetence of the inexpert. Democracy tends to give the nod to the people, however, ill informed they may be, hoping and possibly assuming (without evidence) that in the long run the people will figure out its mistakes and make better choices. Aristocracy or elitism assumes its decisions will be better informed, ignoring how its judgments will be skewed by its own narcissistic biases. The former is a danger because it is too uninformed and inexpert; the latter a danger because it is not as well informed nor as expert as it thinks.
The United States, and indeed most Parliamentary democracies have attempted to resolve this through representation, assuming that representatives (aka politicians) will be more skillful at directing government in a way that is salutary to the public. While seemingly a reasonable compromise, this solution has proved itself to be riddled with flaws, including the tendency of such representatives to be influenced by party loyalty, dark money, and election tampering.
Is there any solution? Probably not a perfect one, but given the tendency of the powerful to usurp even greater power, and those more distant from those they represent to be less answerable to them, I think the solution is to weaken centralized authority and keep the power more decentralized and close to the local community. We also need to find a way to engage the public more in the political process. In Brazil, voting is mandatory. In this country, you participate if you feel like it. This election I voted on 5 separate bond issues and 7 or more referenda. I had no awareness of many of these referenda. If we don't have a lively engaged and respectful debate about politics on an ongoing basis in local town halls, we will never learn to respect our opponents, never learn from them, and become ever more entrenched in our monocular polarized viewpoints.
"Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness." One doesn't need to be a genius to recognize that a Being that transcends time and space is the only answer to the question of the vastness of the universe, the infinitesimal reality of matter, and the past eternity of creation prior to Genesis 1. 2 Peter speaks to a reality we should all thoughtfully consider, "...knowing that shortly I must put off my tent..." We will all put off our tents one day, if the Lord tarries. That's the reality we can ignore or dismiss at our peril.
Klaus and his queer 1st mate are failing. The club is desperately panicking. They have the brazen stupidity attempting "the inevitable" but not the mind power, nor the resources to make it happen.
Hmmm…quick listen to an interview where he speaks of the need for eugenics (to improve the gene pool) and that individuals doing what they want to do (you mean freedom?) have caused societies decline. These musings frankly seem more in line with WEF. What am I missing?
Before remarking or weighing in on the topic at hand, I will need to study the post in more detail as I am unfamiliar with this brilliant human being you so generously introduced to us. I've been reflecting on your earlier query regarding what visions we have regarding alternative realities for living our best lives, in light of our current state of disillusion. I cannot fathom a way through until a significant number of individuals resolve to learn more about their own self-hood, as in, what makes them "tick", what conscious and unconscious ways of being rule their lives, what motivates and drives them to do what they do, how they perceive, sense, make decisions and by whose authority do they lead their lives. This is a tall order, yes absolutely. What we are dealing with here is the deliberate reduction of human sentience through mass homogenization of education, societal and cultural indoctrination, and focus on establishing a collective order of things. To lead any significant portion of humanity toward a self-reflective consciousness would be a tremendous feat. What say our brilliant minds to this dilemma?
There is nothing new under the sun. Klaus and Yuval's vision is Hitler vision 2.0. Hitler wanted a genetically superior master race with a high degree of social connectivity and a distinct and elevated leadership. Klaus and Yuval want the same thing, only chipped. The alternative "rejection of centralized authority" and distribution of decision making is also nothing new. These were the bedrock founding principles for what's left of the United States. You know, all that anti king, limited federal government, state sovereignty, direct voting, created equal kind of stuff. Clearly the latter was the best model. Too bad it is all but gone now. So what all of this heady talk is about is actually the quiet part nobody wants to say out loud. Hint, its what happened when this nation was born...jmo of course.
"In a reality where the physical world is held accountable to empirical or mathematical science, any scientifically irrelevant theology is implicitly displaced. This makes theological systems untouchable by science and vice versa, depriving science of moral guidance and encouraging the revelatory creation of different metaphysical realities associated with conflicting promises and instructions involving the physical world. (These metaphysical realities include not just overtly religious frameworks, but the random materialism embraced by many scientists and followers of science.) The resulting disagreements cause, or provide pretexts for, real-world conflicts."
Seems that he is describing our current situation. Science has been deprived of moral guidance and we are being propelled by pseudo-religious frameworks, such as climate change or transhumanism, into oblivion. I am not smart enough to see how the Human Singularity he describes will prevail...
"both capitalism and collectivism, as they are monopolistically practiced on the national and global scales, lead to oligarchy and a loss of individuality for the vast majority of people."
One of my best thoughts is free market capitalism is opposed to the free market economy.
Another is, the professed communists refuse to live in communes.
So look at the last 500-1000 years of humanity and tell me we will be intelligent/courageous enough as a species to distribute as noted. We are a weak species, and if the world is not stupid enough to let the globalists take over, then we will be stupid enough to create AI that will take over. One way or nougat, this idiotic species will cede power to some central authority; we are simply too weak to do anything to our benefit. Again, look at the last 1000 years and convince me differently.
I have become nihilistic and believe we don't deserve to exist as we are too filled with avarice and idiocy.
I am glad I only have a few years left as a member of this moronic species.
With the upcoming Biden-Fetterman 2024 presidential ticket, commonly known as the “No Brainer”, intellectual articles like this are a breath of fresh air. That said, I’ve always imagined WEF wretches would eventually kill each other off one day, as by their nature. Barring that not happening soon enough perhaps a great revolt by the masses may occur, like in “The Hunger Games”. If Tech Singularity spirals us out of control then it’s by definition out of our control, so yes, send Divine Intervention, please 🙏.
I was put off at the very beginning of the video! Bifurcation?? (and I know what that word means!) That demonstrates either a lack of imagination or prescience. I can believe the former but not the latter. I put this guy in the bin labeled with Eisenhower's definition of an intellectual: a [person] who takes more words than necessary to tell more than [they] know. And I don't even find it fun to read.
What looks to me much more probably to be a real bifurcation is The Empire of Lies* (US and vassals, WEF) vs the Global South + Russia, i.e. The Multipolar World.
*Some folk add Chaos and Plunder to the title, but I find that too much of a mouth full though I agree it's appropriate.
"In order to have a meaningful mass awakening, the content of the awakening must be defined and distributed to the members of humanity, thus immunizing them against parasitic mind control. Because this content must be spiritual, the involvement of religion is unavoidable." He says it so well. Either we accept the greater reality of God, or the elite god-men will control everyone else.
This seemed like a systems analysis view of the world. Tech system vs. spiritual system. But I see life as more of a human organizational problem. A small percentage of humans are just different and cause problems for the majority. They are insatiable and would consume and/or own the entire planet if there were no constraints. They enjoy dominating and controlling others - even owning others. Obtaining monopoly power is the game. Unless we can figure out a way to keep these people from positions where they can gain control and harm others, we will continually find ourselves returning to this environment.
Catherine Austin Fitts of Solari envisions developing decentralized, local alternatives.I find that very appealing, but I don't see how it will withstand the war that will be brought against it. I think the author is correct that some kind of alternative cognitive mass awakening is required, but how? Mass non-compliance is the only chance but I can't see it happening. I almost think if you really got through to people that the next step is slavery, most of them would sign up willingly. I just read India has 92% of its population under the digital ID system. I'm sure China is already there and there isn't much resistance happening in the US. Information has been weaponized and so many people are simply not curious. They are just sponges soaking up whatever they're fed.
I'm praying for divine intervention.
Homeland Security isn’t doing anything without Brandon puppeteers approval. It is being directed from the top. This Nation has been sold out by traitors throughout our Government.
A few years ago I read a "transhumanist" novel. I immediately recognized two things: first, transhumanists are males in an arrested state of development with a maturation level of about 15. This has nothing to do with intelligence, and everything to do with maturity. Second, no woman who is or has been a mother could ever do anything but laugh at the idiocy that is transhumanism. Transhumanism requires that the practitioner have absolutely no empathy, and a little boy's love of cool gadgets. That is it. The end.
The duality of centralized control in the hands of elites vs. decentralized democratic humanistic political organization seems to me to be as old as civilization. Same oppressor beast, dressed up now in techno clothing. Same fearful subservient and misinformed populace, now made so through censorship as opposed to by lack of education. I think it is reflective of an irresolvable conundrum of politics: give too much power to the elites and the power will go to their heads and they will become oppressors; give too much power to the people and they will make decisions out of ignorance, lack of experience and become disordered -- a kind of ochlocracy of the ignorant.
The Remains Of The Day, with Anthony Hopkins is a movie that explores this dichotomy: showing the folly of both the elites and the incompetence of the inexpert. Democracy tends to give the nod to the people, however, ill informed they may be, hoping and possibly assuming (without evidence) that in the long run the people will figure out its mistakes and make better choices. Aristocracy or elitism assumes its decisions will be better informed, ignoring how its judgments will be skewed by its own narcissistic biases. The former is a danger because it is too uninformed and inexpert; the latter a danger because it is not as well informed nor as expert as it thinks.
The United States, and indeed most Parliamentary democracies have attempted to resolve this through representation, assuming that representatives (aka politicians) will be more skillful at directing government in a way that is salutary to the public. While seemingly a reasonable compromise, this solution has proved itself to be riddled with flaws, including the tendency of such representatives to be influenced by party loyalty, dark money, and election tampering.
Is there any solution? Probably not a perfect one, but given the tendency of the powerful to usurp even greater power, and those more distant from those they represent to be less answerable to them, I think the solution is to weaken centralized authority and keep the power more decentralized and close to the local community. We also need to find a way to engage the public more in the political process. In Brazil, voting is mandatory. In this country, you participate if you feel like it. This election I voted on 5 separate bond issues and 7 or more referenda. I had no awareness of many of these referenda. If we don't have a lively engaged and respectful debate about politics on an ongoing basis in local town halls, we will never learn to respect our opponents, never learn from them, and become ever more entrenched in our monocular polarized viewpoints.
"Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness." One doesn't need to be a genius to recognize that a Being that transcends time and space is the only answer to the question of the vastness of the universe, the infinitesimal reality of matter, and the past eternity of creation prior to Genesis 1. 2 Peter speaks to a reality we should all thoughtfully consider, "...knowing that shortly I must put off my tent..." We will all put off our tents one day, if the Lord tarries. That's the reality we can ignore or dismiss at our peril.
Klaus and his queer 1st mate are failing. The club is desperately panicking. They have the brazen stupidity attempting "the inevitable" but not the mind power, nor the resources to make it happen.
Hmmm…quick listen to an interview where he speaks of the need for eugenics (to improve the gene pool) and that individuals doing what they want to do (you mean freedom?) have caused societies decline. These musings frankly seem more in line with WEF. What am I missing?
Before remarking or weighing in on the topic at hand, I will need to study the post in more detail as I am unfamiliar with this brilliant human being you so generously introduced to us. I've been reflecting on your earlier query regarding what visions we have regarding alternative realities for living our best lives, in light of our current state of disillusion. I cannot fathom a way through until a significant number of individuals resolve to learn more about their own self-hood, as in, what makes them "tick", what conscious and unconscious ways of being rule their lives, what motivates and drives them to do what they do, how they perceive, sense, make decisions and by whose authority do they lead their lives. This is a tall order, yes absolutely. What we are dealing with here is the deliberate reduction of human sentience through mass homogenization of education, societal and cultural indoctrination, and focus on establishing a collective order of things. To lead any significant portion of humanity toward a self-reflective consciousness would be a tremendous feat. What say our brilliant minds to this dilemma?
There is nothing new under the sun. Klaus and Yuval's vision is Hitler vision 2.0. Hitler wanted a genetically superior master race with a high degree of social connectivity and a distinct and elevated leadership. Klaus and Yuval want the same thing, only chipped. The alternative "rejection of centralized authority" and distribution of decision making is also nothing new. These were the bedrock founding principles for what's left of the United States. You know, all that anti king, limited federal government, state sovereignty, direct voting, created equal kind of stuff. Clearly the latter was the best model. Too bad it is all but gone now. So what all of this heady talk is about is actually the quiet part nobody wants to say out loud. Hint, its what happened when this nation was born...jmo of course.
From an interview of Langan (url below):
"In a reality where the physical world is held accountable to empirical or mathematical science, any scientifically irrelevant theology is implicitly displaced. This makes theological systems untouchable by science and vice versa, depriving science of moral guidance and encouraging the revelatory creation of different metaphysical realities associated with conflicting promises and instructions involving the physical world. (These metaphysical realities include not just overtly religious frameworks, but the random materialism embraced by many scientists and followers of science.) The resulting disagreements cause, or provide pretexts for, real-world conflicts."
Seems that he is describing our current situation. Science has been deprived of moral guidance and we are being propelled by pseudo-religious frameworks, such as climate change or transhumanism, into oblivion. I am not smart enough to see how the Human Singularity he describes will prevail...
url: https://superscholar.org/interviews/christopher-michael-langan/
"both capitalism and collectivism, as they are monopolistically practiced on the national and global scales, lead to oligarchy and a loss of individuality for the vast majority of people."
One of my best thoughts is free market capitalism is opposed to the free market economy.
Another is, the professed communists refuse to live in communes.
So look at the last 500-1000 years of humanity and tell me we will be intelligent/courageous enough as a species to distribute as noted. We are a weak species, and if the world is not stupid enough to let the globalists take over, then we will be stupid enough to create AI that will take over. One way or nougat, this idiotic species will cede power to some central authority; we are simply too weak to do anything to our benefit. Again, look at the last 1000 years and convince me differently.
I have become nihilistic and believe we don't deserve to exist as we are too filled with avarice and idiocy.
I am glad I only have a few years left as a member of this moronic species.
With the upcoming Biden-Fetterman 2024 presidential ticket, commonly known as the “No Brainer”, intellectual articles like this are a breath of fresh air. That said, I’ve always imagined WEF wretches would eventually kill each other off one day, as by their nature. Barring that not happening soon enough perhaps a great revolt by the masses may occur, like in “The Hunger Games”. If Tech Singularity spirals us out of control then it’s by definition out of our control, so yes, send Divine Intervention, please 🙏.
Wow!!! I second Dr Minor - I Only Accept God’s Mandates!
I was put off at the very beginning of the video! Bifurcation?? (and I know what that word means!) That demonstrates either a lack of imagination or prescience. I can believe the former but not the latter. I put this guy in the bin labeled with Eisenhower's definition of an intellectual: a [person] who takes more words than necessary to tell more than [they] know. And I don't even find it fun to read.
What looks to me much more probably to be a real bifurcation is The Empire of Lies* (US and vassals, WEF) vs the Global South + Russia, i.e. The Multipolar World.
*Some folk add Chaos and Plunder to the title, but I find that too much of a mouth full though I agree it's appropriate.