Limiting "reach" is EXACTLY the same as proscibing speech.
If you say to someone: "here is a closed room with sound-proof walls and you can say anything and everything you want here", this is a violation of freedom of speech.
This involves a fundamental re-definition of what is freedom of speech. Free Speech is a tango. It involves a speaker and an audience. If you eliminate/reduce the audience, you have the deafening sound of one hand clapping.
This should be 101-stuff for any principled legal mind.
You have freedom to speak, but you do not have a right to be heard. However, I as a potential listener should be the one who makes the choice of whether or not to listen. The problem is that someone in the middle is making that decision on my behalf.
If someone sends me a letter, I should get to choose whether or not to open it and read it. No one should be allowed to intercept it and withhold it from me. I may choose to activate a spam filter, but I still get to choose whether I look at the spam.
To get to the bottom line on this topic...I have experienced first hand X. As a 74 year old female with extensive corporate executive roles, I can sniff out like a trained dog “who is who” and know what kind of BS they have been trained to present to the “public”. They are sought out for this role, psychologically assessed and then groomed. Linda is well groomed but does have an Achilles heel. Lack of self-confidence. She is in a “face the public direct role”. She has flubbed a few times. There is much bravado there. She has substantive business acumen and background but is a novice in human behavior as the majority of us here are well versed in. She is the conditioned, brainwashed shill with low self esteem. She’s got the lingo. That’s about it. Apologies if my comments aren’t completely addressing Bob Malone’s terrific content. It’s what I have to say in the moment. Let’s roam where the buffalo room while we can. In freedom, always.
The 5th Circuit decision shows what many already knew--the judiciary is as corrupt as the 2 other branches. Instead of affirming the lower court’s decision, it parsed in favor of government censorship. Liberty dies to thunderous applause.
Why don't they just use TruthSocial or MeWee or alternatives? If enough people left X and FB they would change their tune, just like if enough parents kept their kids out of school, it would change. It is always and forever about $$
Maybe people do listen and don’t understand the consequences of elections. Like the border and all the problems that have been created. April 8th, 2021 Joe Biden said, there is no amendment, no amendment to the constitution that is absolute. Doesn’t it seem the protections given to big pharma and the protections given to big social media mirror each other? I didn’t know that the first amendment’s freedom of speech had exceptions. I can honestly say, though I new this was coming years ago, I’m still surprised the way both political parties have allowed this to be ushered in with barely any resistance. Many people won’t realize what they had, until it’s gone. J.Goodrich
We now see 5 G war, with bio-weapons (COVID and more), Mind War, and Treason. Sadly, most in power have betrayed us -- they call it "Executive Capture" instead of "corruption." Our Elections have been stolen. Directed Energy Weapons are now used against our citizens.
We are deprived of due process and imprisoned for "thought crimes." J6 was only the beginning. Election 2024 is probably America's last chance to stay free.
Our new book’s cover reflects the new type of “Unrestricted War” with China, the New World Order, and the Marxist Left (the uni-party) as deadly enemies. It’s not a war with kinetic weapons, but one of treason, corruption, and betrayal. We are losing.
Sep 9, 2023·edited Sep 9, 2023Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS
I was commenting on Matt's Note to Subscribers yesterday and I was the 667 post. His article now has 1,522. My post was' you should have asked for responses like yes, no, or maybe.'
I also added this "I get Dr. Malone SS articles and sometimes he sends cross posts from other SSers. If interested I read, if not I don't. That works for me."
Isn't Yaccarino just framing the old rhetoric in 'new speak' the end results will still be the same - we don't like what you are saying and how you are saying it, therefore you are shut down. don't care how she frames it, no matter what label she chooses to put on a submission, reducing or totally banning, it's still controlling and limiting.
Learned a lot from the article and comments. The word “safety” is used 14x with a few “healthier” so corporations are praying on people’s fear. I thought it was supposed to be Truth in advertising, not safety? Digital safety used to mean safe from security hacks etc, not for words and thoughts? It’s infuriating and perhaps dovetails with the foment of new variant(s) ? Ever since 2020 “safety” appears to be the premium word to keep people hypnotized and controlled.
Thank you for all your input on this topic in the last few days. Glad to finally get the click and censorship via EU imposed sources. Never a user of the big guys social media. Did Parlor until they killed it.
The 5th Circuit decision is a disappointment to me. I don't think leaving any Gov opportunities to impact are justified. We need to have our approach in order, EU impact not withstanding. Hoping the case will be appealed ASP. (And we get an ethical sane ruling, as initially set out)
We've been watching the fearporn ramping up slowly (frog fear not to cause escapes). I'm seeing more decorative masks at the grocery. Today's feed did include there has been a major increase.... Then just now I see an ET report of a retrenchment. Natural immunity and/or previous boosters may help address the threat. In any case boosters are coming that will/should address the new threats. Just what proofs are they offering to validate their assertions?
It doesn't end and will certainly be increasing. Predators (creatures and humans) escalate their assaults when cornered and threatened. We clearly need to be aware and ready to respond in productive ways.
You are appreciated! Take care! Have a good Sunday! Bestest Always!
I would like to share another source of alternative i.e. “truth based” news. It is the podcast Breaking Points. I feel it is balanced, honest, and informative.
Limiting "reach" is EXACTLY the same as proscibing speech.
If you say to someone: "here is a closed room with sound-proof walls and you can say anything and everything you want here", this is a violation of freedom of speech.
This involves a fundamental re-definition of what is freedom of speech. Free Speech is a tango. It involves a speaker and an audience. If you eliminate/reduce the audience, you have the deafening sound of one hand clapping.
This should be 101-stuff for any principled legal mind.
You have freedom to speak, but you do not have a right to be heard. However, I as a potential listener should be the one who makes the choice of whether or not to listen. The problem is that someone in the middle is making that decision on my behalf.
If someone sends me a letter, I should get to choose whether or not to open it and read it. No one should be allowed to intercept it and withhold it from me. I may choose to activate a spam filter, but I still get to choose whether I look at the spam.
"There is no time in history where the people who were censoring speech were the good guys" —RFK Jr
This applies to social media as well. Why are the powers that shouldn't be so afraid of people conversing and sharing ideas? Food for thought.
To get to the bottom line on this topic...I have experienced first hand X. As a 74 year old female with extensive corporate executive roles, I can sniff out like a trained dog “who is who” and know what kind of BS they have been trained to present to the “public”. They are sought out for this role, psychologically assessed and then groomed. Linda is well groomed but does have an Achilles heel. Lack of self-confidence. She is in a “face the public direct role”. She has flubbed a few times. There is much bravado there. She has substantive business acumen and background but is a novice in human behavior as the majority of us here are well versed in. She is the conditioned, brainwashed shill with low self esteem. She’s got the lingo. That’s about it. Apologies if my comments aren’t completely addressing Bob Malone’s terrific content. It’s what I have to say in the moment. Let’s roam where the buffalo room while we can. In freedom, always.
The 5th Circuit decision shows what many already knew--the judiciary is as corrupt as the 2 other branches. Instead of affirming the lower court’s decision, it parsed in favor of government censorship. Liberty dies to thunderous applause.
Now I am curious. Are Linda Yaccarino and Nina Jankowicz distant cousins?
Also Bari Weiss and Naomi Wolfe.
Why don't they just use TruthSocial or MeWee or alternatives? If enough people left X and FB they would change their tune, just like if enough parents kept their kids out of school, it would change. It is always and forever about $$
Maybe people do listen and don’t understand the consequences of elections. Like the border and all the problems that have been created. April 8th, 2021 Joe Biden said, there is no amendment, no amendment to the constitution that is absolute. Doesn’t it seem the protections given to big pharma and the protections given to big social media mirror each other? I didn’t know that the first amendment’s freedom of speech had exceptions. I can honestly say, though I new this was coming years ago, I’m still surprised the way both political parties have allowed this to be ushered in with barely any resistance. Many people won’t realize what they had, until it’s gone. J.Goodrich
Orwell would be proud.
We now see 5 G war, with bio-weapons (COVID and more), Mind War, and Treason. Sadly, most in power have betrayed us -- they call it "Executive Capture" instead of "corruption." Our Elections have been stolen. Directed Energy Weapons are now used against our citizens.
We are deprived of due process and imprisoned for "thought crimes." J6 was only the beginning. Election 2024 is probably America's last chance to stay free.
Our new book’s cover reflects the new type of “Unrestricted War” with China, the New World Order, and the Marxist Left (the uni-party) as deadly enemies. It’s not a war with kinetic weapons, but one of treason, corruption, and betrayal. We are losing.
https://open.substack.com/pub/jtrudel/p/do-not-comply-will-put-you-into-the?r=6r9ya&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I was commenting on Matt's Note to Subscribers yesterday and I was the 667 post. His article now has 1,522. My post was' you should have asked for responses like yes, no, or maybe.'
I also added this "I get Dr. Malone SS articles and sometimes he sends cross posts from other SSers. If interested I read, if not I don't. That works for me."
Isn't Yaccarino just framing the old rhetoric in 'new speak' the end results will still be the same - we don't like what you are saying and how you are saying it, therefore you are shut down. don't care how she frames it, no matter what label she chooses to put on a submission, reducing or totally banning, it's still controlling and limiting.
Free speech and "content moderation tools": an oxymoron like "freedom of speech, not reach." Lipstick on a pig.
Learned a lot from the article and comments. The word “safety” is used 14x with a few “healthier” so corporations are praying on people’s fear. I thought it was supposed to be Truth in advertising, not safety? Digital safety used to mean safe from security hacks etc, not for words and thoughts? It’s infuriating and perhaps dovetails with the foment of new variant(s) ? Ever since 2020 “safety” appears to be the premium word to keep people hypnotized and controlled.
Thank you for all your input on this topic in the last few days. Glad to finally get the click and censorship via EU imposed sources. Never a user of the big guys social media. Did Parlor until they killed it.
The 5th Circuit decision is a disappointment to me. I don't think leaving any Gov opportunities to impact are justified. We need to have our approach in order, EU impact not withstanding. Hoping the case will be appealed ASP. (And we get an ethical sane ruling, as initially set out)
We've been watching the fearporn ramping up slowly (frog fear not to cause escapes). I'm seeing more decorative masks at the grocery. Today's feed did include there has been a major increase.... Then just now I see an ET report of a retrenchment. Natural immunity and/or previous boosters may help address the threat. In any case boosters are coming that will/should address the new threats. Just what proofs are they offering to validate their assertions?
It doesn't end and will certainly be increasing. Predators (creatures and humans) escalate their assaults when cornered and threatened. We clearly need to be aware and ready to respond in productive ways.
You are appreciated! Take care! Have a good Sunday! Bestest Always!
I would like to share another source of alternative i.e. “truth based” news. It is the podcast Breaking Points. I feel it is balanced, honest, and informative.
Yup. You cannot say things like "gender appropriation is wrong" on platforms like X and expect anyone to hear or see it but yourself.