The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded for discovering use of Pseudouridine to suppress immune responses to synthetic mRNA, and use of that discovery in COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.
"But may well be a bad thing for things like autoimmune disease and the ability of the immune system to control other infectious disease and cancer.” Sadly, this is what we are seeing.
These findings will be eeked out little by little over a very long time. Never in the media tho, where any people who watch and listen (the majority of people, sadly) will ever read or know of these findings. You and others have many subscribers, and yet the bigger picture is hidden from view. Even a good friend who knows I have been reading about the details of this slight of hand for 3 years, isn't interested in my findings.
Dr Malone, when will you discuss our LINE-1 retrotransponson and the very real risk of the synthetic mRNA being reverse transited and inserted into our DNA as demonstrated in the study at Lund University in Sweden by Dr DeMarinis and her team?? There have been subsequent publications discussing how the pseudo uridine modified mRNA is an ideal target for LINE-1. Copies of sequences for LINE-1 are approximately 50% of our known DNA sequences that code for something. Why isn’t this risk being further studied?? They are playing roulette with our genome since we have no idea where reverse transcribed sequences may be inserted nor the consequences yet.
My question is: If N1 Methyl pseudouridine is structurally more closely related to the molecule Thymidine, which is found in DNA (not RNA), then doesn't it make sense that it would survive longer in the body? Obviously, the human body carefully preserves and protects DNA in the cell nucleus. Perhaps this protection extends to DNA in general in some fashion? At least insofar as there is no mechanism to remove its components? Your thoughts?
Oct 5, 2023·edited Oct 5, 2023Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS
Thank you for explaining how mRNA works.
And thanks for the protection racket article. In the mid-1970's, I was in charge of training all the ward clerks at a large Chicago hospital. Thanks to Medicaid all the men in the "charity" ward got scheduled for barium enemas so the interns could see how they work. None of the men had any need for them, but the forms got filled out and the hospital got paid and the men suffered through an unnecessary procedure.
It's all about the money. Yes, there are some fine doctors out there, but even the genius who saved my face bills patients more than insurance pays, so if you don't have insurance, you have to pay the higher price. And my hospital bill for the surgery and one night came to over $100,000!!! My insurance company only allowed about $22,000, and because I was an in-patient I just had to pay the deductible. But if I hadn't had my insurance, I would have been liable for the one hundred grand plus.
What those doctors told Dr. Gerson about their wealthy patient, that you don't cure him, you treat him, tells us everything we need to know.
An understatement "What is clear is that, for some reason, the FDA suspended its normal processes and procedures which would typically require that a biologically active new chemical entity be thoroughly investigated prior to use in humans. The reason and logic behind this gross negligence should be thoroughly investigated and disclosed to the public." That omission goes hand-in-hand with the known errors in policy for the NPI used to "slow the spread". Hopefully Congress will use its oversight function to establish accountability for government errors and general incompetence.
As a mere lay person, I read the whole article, along with some of the links, until I thought my head would explode. My conclusion is...the world is filled with guinea pigs, and this "vaccine" was given willy-nilly to as many as who would accept it into their bodies. I didn't. What I came away with from this information is everyone's RNA panel is different, and everyone should have been tested to see how their individual body would react to this "vaccine". Of course, that would be impossible, given the fear porn we were all fed at the onset of the "pandemic". And so we wait... And we continue to be inundated with more persuasive messaging to take the jab, and even have it given to our children. Mary Shelley would be running to her typewriter!
Wow! And they(the leading powers in the Fauci camp) said, shoot the jab into as many as possible so the results can be studied. Experimenting without permission!and it Should have been stopped before the first one was delivered.
Dr. Malone, thank you for your well founded primer on pseudouridine. My big takeaway: We were lab rats. We remain lab rats because the basic clinical approach of the perpetrators hasn’t changed and their experimentation(on us) continues. I have had this assumption for some time. One lurking question I still carry is: Are they trying to fine tune the mRNA vaccine product based on their massive crowd sourcing experiment, and if so what does a fine tuned product look like, if that is what they are attempting? I think it looks like more death, much lower population fertility and more clever obfuscation of what they have done.
This is really bloody frightening. There is no way they will be able to keep this under wraps from the public forever. The average person could understand this with just a few key pieces of information from this substack. And the average person would be 100% swayed to the truth if their doctors told them this. Every doctor would get this in one read and would have to engage in willful denial to not share it.
This article is a great reminder for me. The complexity, shown in the diagrams and descriptions, is another reminder that the Creator of all things that were and are is well beyond human understanding. Science is a human search for understanding what? That God’s design is flawed and needs fixing? That humans can overcome illness and death? At some point the scientific goal will eventually kill us all because it involves fallen people. Did God create everything using a system of trial and error? No. All His creatures have an inherent adaptive mechanism (evolution) and humans were also given a mental capacity to create an environment that surely weakens their natural adaptability; artificial light, heating and cooling devices and so forth. Nature provides that only the strongest survive to maintain the existence of the species. I don’t blame anyone for wanting a different system and trying to achieve that. I can read because I have glasses.
I remember studying genetics some 55 years ago and the base pairs of DNA. Like many things in the body it’s a delicately balanced system. The hubris of these people playing around with nature, and even worse, the so-called heath authorities who failed to provide oversight and hold anyone accountable.
Even one of the members of the committee lied when asked by a reporter about concerns of the mRNA. The response was that it is “transient” in the body and the vaccine is “safe and efficient”. Shameful.
"But may well be a bad thing for things like autoimmune disease and the ability of the immune system to control other infectious disease and cancer.” Sadly, this is what we are seeing.
These findings will be eeked out little by little over a very long time. Never in the media tho, where any people who watch and listen (the majority of people, sadly) will ever read or know of these findings. You and others have many subscribers, and yet the bigger picture is hidden from view. Even a good friend who knows I have been reading about the details of this slight of hand for 3 years, isn't interested in my findings.
Dr Malone, when will you discuss our LINE-1 retrotransponson and the very real risk of the synthetic mRNA being reverse transited and inserted into our DNA as demonstrated in the study at Lund University in Sweden by Dr DeMarinis and her team?? There have been subsequent publications discussing how the pseudo uridine modified mRNA is an ideal target for LINE-1. Copies of sequences for LINE-1 are approximately 50% of our known DNA sequences that code for something. Why isn’t this risk being further studied?? They are playing roulette with our genome since we have no idea where reverse transcribed sequences may be inserted nor the consequences yet.
My question is: If N1 Methyl pseudouridine is structurally more closely related to the molecule Thymidine, which is found in DNA (not RNA), then doesn't it make sense that it would survive longer in the body? Obviously, the human body carefully preserves and protects DNA in the cell nucleus. Perhaps this protection extends to DNA in general in some fashion? At least insofar as there is no mechanism to remove its components? Your thoughts?
Thank you for explaining how mRNA works.
And thanks for the protection racket article. In the mid-1970's, I was in charge of training all the ward clerks at a large Chicago hospital. Thanks to Medicaid all the men in the "charity" ward got scheduled for barium enemas so the interns could see how they work. None of the men had any need for them, but the forms got filled out and the hospital got paid and the men suffered through an unnecessary procedure.
It's all about the money. Yes, there are some fine doctors out there, but even the genius who saved my face bills patients more than insurance pays, so if you don't have insurance, you have to pay the higher price. And my hospital bill for the surgery and one night came to over $100,000!!! My insurance company only allowed about $22,000, and because I was an in-patient I just had to pay the deductible. But if I hadn't had my insurance, I would have been liable for the one hundred grand plus.
What those doctors told Dr. Gerson about their wealthy patient, that you don't cure him, you treat him, tells us everything we need to know.
An understatement "What is clear is that, for some reason, the FDA suspended its normal processes and procedures which would typically require that a biologically active new chemical entity be thoroughly investigated prior to use in humans. The reason and logic behind this gross negligence should be thoroughly investigated and disclosed to the public." That omission goes hand-in-hand with the known errors in policy for the NPI used to "slow the spread". Hopefully Congress will use its oversight function to establish accountability for government errors and general incompetence.
sadly, it is all too easy to imagine a future where this discovery is considered an enormous benefit to humanity
Worrisome. Until now, I had thought only the Nobel "Peace Prize" was BS. Looks like the rest is equally compromised.
As a mere lay person, I read the whole article, along with some of the links, until I thought my head would explode. My conclusion is...the world is filled with guinea pigs, and this "vaccine" was given willy-nilly to as many as who would accept it into their bodies. I didn't. What I came away with from this information is everyone's RNA panel is different, and everyone should have been tested to see how their individual body would react to this "vaccine". Of course, that would be impossible, given the fear porn we were all fed at the onset of the "pandemic". And so we wait... And we continue to be inundated with more persuasive messaging to take the jab, and even have it given to our children. Mary Shelley would be running to her typewriter!
Wow! And they(the leading powers in the Fauci camp) said, shoot the jab into as many as possible so the results can be studied. Experimenting without permission!and it Should have been stopped before the first one was delivered.
Dr. Malone, thank you for your well founded primer on pseudouridine. My big takeaway: We were lab rats. We remain lab rats because the basic clinical approach of the perpetrators hasn’t changed and their experimentation(on us) continues. I have had this assumption for some time. One lurking question I still carry is: Are they trying to fine tune the mRNA vaccine product based on their massive crowd sourcing experiment, and if so what does a fine tuned product look like, if that is what they are attempting? I think it looks like more death, much lower population fertility and more clever obfuscation of what they have done.
This is really bloody frightening. There is no way they will be able to keep this under wraps from the public forever. The average person could understand this with just a few key pieces of information from this substack. And the average person would be 100% swayed to the truth if their doctors told them this. Every doctor would get this in one read and would have to engage in willful denial to not share it.
This article is a great reminder for me. The complexity, shown in the diagrams and descriptions, is another reminder that the Creator of all things that were and are is well beyond human understanding. Science is a human search for understanding what? That God’s design is flawed and needs fixing? That humans can overcome illness and death? At some point the scientific goal will eventually kill us all because it involves fallen people. Did God create everything using a system of trial and error? No. All His creatures have an inherent adaptive mechanism (evolution) and humans were also given a mental capacity to create an environment that surely weakens their natural adaptability; artificial light, heating and cooling devices and so forth. Nature provides that only the strongest survive to maintain the existence of the species. I don’t blame anyone for wanting a different system and trying to achieve that. I can read because I have glasses.
Substack (Latypova): Curious History of a Nobel Laureate Katalin Kariko, alias Zsolt Lengyel
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/katalin-karikos-history-as-a-spy?utm_campaign=email-post&r=rfi2r&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Okay, My head hurts. Early morning reading material with a VERY stiff coffee. 😂 Thank You, Ed
I remember studying genetics some 55 years ago and the base pairs of DNA. Like many things in the body it’s a delicately balanced system. The hubris of these people playing around with nature, and even worse, the so-called heath authorities who failed to provide oversight and hold anyone accountable.
Even one of the members of the committee lied when asked by a reporter about concerns of the mRNA. The response was that it is “transient” in the body and the vaccine is “safe and efficient”. Shameful.