“Just prior to the pandemic, the World Medical Association tried to update the declaration again.”
Fascinating intel, Robert. I’m sure the timing is just a coincidence 🤔
If they tried similar revisions today, I suspect there would be little to no resistance after three years of acclimatization to totalitarianism.
I touched on the Declaration of Helsinki in my letter to Ron Johnson (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-senator-ron-johnson) under #PutPeopleOverPharma. I proposed that it, the Nuremberg Code, and the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights be enshrined in a legally binding manner that prohibits experimentation on human beings without informed consent.
Unfortunately, as Ron told me when we spoke about my proposed legislation, “You know these are never going to pass, right?”
So how do we make these pretty words have bearing in reality? How do we use them to prosecute violators when they are flouted with impunity?
Thank you for sharing this document, Dr. Malone. No, it was not observed and adhered to. How do you hold a massive system accountable when the people involved have truly lost their moral compass? I no longer believe that those bent on evil will be swayed by appeals to ethical and moral personal character and responsibility. Ideological influence that has become cult-like and huge amounts of money used as either a reward/bribe or a stick are hard to overcome. Only mass civil disobedience in the face of tyranny is enough to wake up those who have been cowards. And, should that fail, greater conflagration WILL be the natural outcome. I fear that is the ultimate end-game, because then one becomes an enemy of the state and considered a combatant...'domestic terrorist' is a popular refrain. Sorry, I wish I were more hopeful.
If it were binding, as Nuremberg, or the Hippocratic oath, most medical practitioners of today are guilty of crimes against humanity, as are most of the federal government of this nation, all the manufacturers of this poison they refer to as a vaccine, the state run media that produced hundreds of slick ads and hundreds of lies regarding those of us unvaccinated plebes, and justice will be done. But until we show up, physically in the places that would be considered the top of the food chain, demanding answers, and accountability, it will all memory hole. Until the next one.
Dr. Malone - The real issue is: how to we make it requirement for such policies to be followed on classified/covert programs that we know go on under the umbrella of our own government. I believe we, as good humans, work hard to define and codify such principles but then the cloak of classification obscures our ability to verify. Another case of "oh, we don't do that"...but we do.
I skimmed through it. I get the feeling that using this to assess where they went wrong is like using a fine manners book to assess what is wrong with a riot.
Pardon me for saying this but before any remediation can occur the greed factor which was introduced into our medical industry by the passage of Medicare in 1965 must first be curtailed. Since its passage reports of pre-med students diddling practical lab exams so that students following them would score lower became widespread. I strongly suspect that it was greed and not a driving altruistic need to treat the poor that drove that behavior. And since 1965 the bottom line has largely replaced interest in patients wellbeing in large scale med establishments. Cure this first.
Feb 27·edited Feb 27Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS
I keep asking myself such a simple question, and yet I'm seeing more and more evidence that nobody else sees the truth right in front of us....
Q: What is PUBLIC health?
A: from the very start, a tool for government used to control personal health
I understand that a "public" is intended to function as a group of individuals... I get it... But a "public" doesn't get sick or injured... People do. We have this very simple logic completely backwards in focusing on the larger public in lieu of the private individual. We should be more concerned about personal health as a whole, and let the public health take care of itself.
What about #33? ...must be tested against best known remedies. Why was ivermectin not tested against the Covid vaccine. BTW... ivermectin works and those who got it know it works against Covid.
Clearly there were and remain gross violations of the Declaration of Helsinki in the development and deployment of the Covid vaccines. There is not a single paragraph that was not violated to some degree, and some, such as the stipulated requirements for COMPLETE documentation and public release of research and clinical trial results prior to approval to proceed, were completely violated. But the big takeaway here is not in the details, it is in the big picture. If a government, a culture and a society become completely corrupted, words on a page and the Rule of Law no longer apply. Boxes get checked anyway, or they get ignored and memory holed. Changing the words in the Helsinki Declaration to make them “stronger” and to fill holes and gaps is something many of us might like to do, but will it make any difference? Medical ethics existed in 1930s Germany. As far as the Covid vaccines are concerned, the real problem started even before WARP SPEED, with a corrupt DOD, NIH, CDC and FDA(just to name a few). As to WARP SPEED, we can only say this: Never take a serious medication developed under a Program called Operation Warp Speed. Can the development timeline be addressed by a document like the Helsinki Declaration? Probably not. Is the development timeline an ethical issue? I would argue Yes.
The problems are baked in. The other side, the ones in power now, must be defeated.
Why would the manufactures of the mRNA injections that reprogram cellular function in uncontrollable ways want to follow the rules of honest medical research, when they have been given absolution, and liability protection from the US government? This is a massive crime against humanity, and all we do is talk about it and not stop it.!
For physicians - if you're practicing political medicine, you're practicing politics, not medicine. You might as well be bleeding patients or using voodoo. Democrat dogma is not medicine. Stop pretending otherwise. For example, either hydroxychloroquine is effective against Covid or it isn't. Trump's views on it were and are irrelevant.
For pharma - if your business model is bribing regulators and legislators, get a new business model. When you're breaking the law, don't expect the law to protect you from an enraged citizenry.
Well, those guidelines were obviously not observed. But, let's be realistic here: none of these international treaties, guidelines, rules, etc. have any teeth. And that is by design. They're all for show, to make people (especially those in the West) feel better about the aims of these international bodies, which amount to one world government, a "true" socialist government, with all property, food manufacture and distribution, medical care, and finances controlled by one central overarching government. Focusing on details like these declarations just distracts from the more important message that needs to get out. These types of declarations and agreements will never have any real meaning unless they are written into law within large nations. I don't see that happening for the reasons cited above.
The Declaration of Helsinki
Three points stood out (among numerous others):
1) There was no plan for compensation for any of human subjects harmed by being test cases for these novel "vaccines;"
2) No one I know who got vaxxed was ever given information that equalled "informed consent;"
3) Every pregnant woman who got vaxxed was a pure test subject, as no test results on pregnant women were ever published before the vaxxes commenced.
The Declaration of Helsinki was completely disregarded during the pandemic of impending wealth, in my opinion. 😥
“Just prior to the pandemic, the World Medical Association tried to update the declaration again.”
Fascinating intel, Robert. I’m sure the timing is just a coincidence 🤔
If they tried similar revisions today, I suspect there would be little to no resistance after three years of acclimatization to totalitarianism.
I touched on the Declaration of Helsinki in my letter to Ron Johnson (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-senator-ron-johnson) under #PutPeopleOverPharma. I proposed that it, the Nuremberg Code, and the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights be enshrined in a legally binding manner that prohibits experimentation on human beings without informed consent.
Unfortunately, as Ron told me when we spoke about my proposed legislation, “You know these are never going to pass, right?”
So how do we make these pretty words have bearing in reality? How do we use them to prosecute violators when they are flouted with impunity?
Thank you for sharing this document, Dr. Malone. No, it was not observed and adhered to. How do you hold a massive system accountable when the people involved have truly lost their moral compass? I no longer believe that those bent on evil will be swayed by appeals to ethical and moral personal character and responsibility. Ideological influence that has become cult-like and huge amounts of money used as either a reward/bribe or a stick are hard to overcome. Only mass civil disobedience in the face of tyranny is enough to wake up those who have been cowards. And, should that fail, greater conflagration WILL be the natural outcome. I fear that is the ultimate end-game, because then one becomes an enemy of the state and considered a combatant...'domestic terrorist' is a popular refrain. Sorry, I wish I were more hopeful.
If it were binding, as Nuremberg, or the Hippocratic oath, most medical practitioners of today are guilty of crimes against humanity, as are most of the federal government of this nation, all the manufacturers of this poison they refer to as a vaccine, the state run media that produced hundreds of slick ads and hundreds of lies regarding those of us unvaccinated plebes, and justice will be done. But until we show up, physically in the places that would be considered the top of the food chain, demanding answers, and accountability, it will all memory hole. Until the next one.
Dr. Malone - The real issue is: how to we make it requirement for such policies to be followed on classified/covert programs that we know go on under the umbrella of our own government. I believe we, as good humans, work hard to define and codify such principles but then the cloak of classification obscures our ability to verify. Another case of "oh, we don't do that"...but we do.
I skimmed through it. I get the feeling that using this to assess where they went wrong is like using a fine manners book to assess what is wrong with a riot.
Pardon me for saying this but before any remediation can occur the greed factor which was introduced into our medical industry by the passage of Medicare in 1965 must first be curtailed. Since its passage reports of pre-med students diddling practical lab exams so that students following them would score lower became widespread. I strongly suspect that it was greed and not a driving altruistic need to treat the poor that drove that behavior. And since 1965 the bottom line has largely replaced interest in patients wellbeing in large scale med establishments. Cure this first.
I keep asking myself such a simple question, and yet I'm seeing more and more evidence that nobody else sees the truth right in front of us....
Q: What is PUBLIC health?
A: from the very start, a tool for government used to control personal health
I understand that a "public" is intended to function as a group of individuals... I get it... But a "public" doesn't get sick or injured... People do. We have this very simple logic completely backwards in focusing on the larger public in lieu of the private individual. We should be more concerned about personal health as a whole, and let the public health take care of itself.
Fear is at the heart of this thinking.
What about #33? ...must be tested against best known remedies. Why was ivermectin not tested against the Covid vaccine. BTW... ivermectin works and those who got it know it works against Covid.
Clearly there were and remain gross violations of the Declaration of Helsinki in the development and deployment of the Covid vaccines. There is not a single paragraph that was not violated to some degree, and some, such as the stipulated requirements for COMPLETE documentation and public release of research and clinical trial results prior to approval to proceed, were completely violated. But the big takeaway here is not in the details, it is in the big picture. If a government, a culture and a society become completely corrupted, words on a page and the Rule of Law no longer apply. Boxes get checked anyway, or they get ignored and memory holed. Changing the words in the Helsinki Declaration to make them “stronger” and to fill holes and gaps is something many of us might like to do, but will it make any difference? Medical ethics existed in 1930s Germany. As far as the Covid vaccines are concerned, the real problem started even before WARP SPEED, with a corrupt DOD, NIH, CDC and FDA(just to name a few). As to WARP SPEED, we can only say this: Never take a serious medication developed under a Program called Operation Warp Speed. Can the development timeline be addressed by a document like the Helsinki Declaration? Probably not. Is the development timeline an ethical issue? I would argue Yes.
The problems are baked in. The other side, the ones in power now, must be defeated.
Why would the manufactures of the mRNA injections that reprogram cellular function in uncontrollable ways want to follow the rules of honest medical research, when they have been given absolution, and liability protection from the US government? This is a massive crime against humanity, and all we do is talk about it and not stop it.!
For physicians - if you're practicing political medicine, you're practicing politics, not medicine. You might as well be bleeding patients or using voodoo. Democrat dogma is not medicine. Stop pretending otherwise. For example, either hydroxychloroquine is effective against Covid or it isn't. Trump's views on it were and are irrelevant.
For pharma - if your business model is bribing regulators and legislators, get a new business model. When you're breaking the law, don't expect the law to protect you from an enraged citizenry.
Btw, read 37 again. And again.
Well, those guidelines were obviously not observed. But, let's be realistic here: none of these international treaties, guidelines, rules, etc. have any teeth. And that is by design. They're all for show, to make people (especially those in the West) feel better about the aims of these international bodies, which amount to one world government, a "true" socialist government, with all property, food manufacture and distribution, medical care, and finances controlled by one central overarching government. Focusing on details like these declarations just distracts from the more important message that needs to get out. These types of declarations and agreements will never have any real meaning unless they are written into law within large nations. I don't see that happening for the reasons cited above.
Wow I'm stunned.
They wiped their arrogant arse with the declaration. I appreciate you and Jill fighting for the truth.
Apparently all boundaries have been breeched.
I'm grateful to know Jesus ultimately wins this battle.
I'll continue to pray fervantly for you both and other warriors on the front line and do my part in my realm of influence.
The medical establishment completely nuked this Declaration. SHAME on each and every participant.