Sep 29, 2023·edited Sep 29, 2023Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS
The dog's behavior - involving two different dogs - suggests problems beyond neglectful pet owners. I can't help but wonder what's going on between Biden and the dog or between Jill and the dog when no one is around.
So the causation behind the correlation between increased temperatures and SUDs is purely a factor of "global warming" and has absolutely nothing to do with the massive amounts of Fentanyl pouring across our wide open southern (non) border and finding it's way into a vast array of products.
Wbat'a truly absurd about Commander is that a moderate amoint of training and exercise would probably fix most of the problems. Wirh all the money rhe Bidens stole/extorted, they should easily be able to afford a trainer. Or call Ceasar Milano! How hard is that?!!
(A) “Dangerous dog” means any dog that without provocation:
(i) Causes a serious injury to a person or domestic animal; or
(ii) Engages in behavior described in paragraph (4)(A)(i) of this section subsequent to having been determined to be a potentially dangerous dog pursuant to § 8-1902.
(4) (A) “Potentially dangerous dog” means any dog that:
(i) Without provocation, chases or menaces a person or domestic animal in an aggressive manner, causing an injury to a person or domestic animal that is less severe than a serious injury;
(ii) In a menacing manner, approaches without provocation any person or domestic animal as if to attack, or has demonstrated a propensity to attack without provocation or otherwise to endanger the safety of human beings or domestic animals; or
(iii) Is running at-large and has been impounded by an animal control agency 3 or more times in the District within any 12-month period.
(5) “Proper enclosure” means secure confinement indoors or secure confinement outdoors in a locked structure designed and constructed to:(A) Deter escape of the dog; (B) Protect the dog from the elements; and (C) Prevent contact with the dog from humans and other domestic animals.
(6) “Serious injury” means any physical injury that results in broken bones or lacerations requiring multiple sutures or cosmetic surgery.
§ 8–1905. Dangerous dog and potentially dangerous dog owner responsibilities.
It shall be unlawful to:
(1) Keep a potentially dangerous or dangerous dog without a valid certificate of registration issued under § 8-1904;
(2) Permit a potentially dangerous dog to be outside a proper enclosure unless the potentially dangerous dog is under the control of a responsible person and restrained by a chain or leash, not exceeding 4 feet in length;
(3) Fail to maintain a dangerous dog exclusively on the owner’s property except for medical treatment or examination. When removed from the owner’s property for medical treatment or examination, the dangerous dog shall be caged or under the control of a responsible person and muzzled and restrained with a chain or leash, not exceeding 4 feet in length. The muzzle shall be made in a manner that will not cause injury to the dangerous dog or interfere with its vision or respiration, but shall prevent it from biting any human being or animal;
(4) Fail to notify the Mayor within 24 hours if a potentially dangerous or dangerous dog is on the loose, is unconfined, has attacked another domestic animal, has attacked a human being, hasdied, has been sold, or has been given away. If the potentially dangerous or dangerous dog has been sold or given away, the owner shall also provide the Mayor with the name, address, and telephone number of the new owner of the potentially dangerous or dangerous dog;
(5) Fail to surrender a potentially dangerous or dangerous dog to the Mayor for safe confinement pending disposition of the case when there is a reason to believe that the potentially dangerous or dangerous dog poses a threat to public safety;
(6) Fail to comply with any special security or care requirements for a potentially dangerous or dangerous dog the Mayor may establish pursuant to § 8-1903; or
(7) Remove a dangerous dog from the District without written permission from the Mayor.
(a) An owner of a dangerous or potentially dangerous dog who violates the provisions of § 8-1904 or § 8-1905 shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a misdemeanor and be subject to a fine not to exceed $500, imprisonment not to exceed 90 days, or both for a first offense, and a fine not to exceed $1,000, imprisonment not to exceed 90 days, or both for a second or subsequent offense. Prosecutions for violations of § 8-1904 or § 8-1905 pursuant to this subsection shall be brought in the name of the District of Columbia in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia by the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia.
(b) An owner of a potentially dangerous or dangerous dog that causes serious injury to or kills a human being or a domestic animal without provocation shall be fined up to $10,000.
(c) A violation of this chapter shall be a civil infraction for purposes of Chapter 18 of Title 2 Civil fines, penalties, and fees may be imposed as sanctions for any infraction of the provisions of this chapter, or the rules issued under authority of this chapter pursuant to Chapter 18 of Title 2. Adjudication of any infractions shall be pursuant to Chapter 18 of Title 2
(d) The fines set forth in this section shall not be limited by § 22-3571.01.
Budget: A formula for determining that you need a raise.
Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.
The sanctuary city/defund the police boomerang comic reminded me of this song my father used to sing:
My boomerang won't come back - My boomerang won't come back - I throwed the thing all over the place - Practiced til I was blue in the face - I'm a big disgrace to the Aboriginal race - My boomerang won't come back
Looks like the idiotic liberals don't have this problem. If liberalism is a mental disease...maybe it's caused by them getting hit in the head a few too many times by all those boomerangs...
Interesting that PETA, Humane Society, nor ASPCA seem to care that the Biden family has a pattern of raising dogs that are fear biters, a clear indication of an abusive home.
Gosh---Do you think people fall into pools after they watch Nicholas Cage films? I mean in the media, correlation implies causation, right? So maybe they drown themselves after watching the films? Or WHILE watching them? In that case, isn’t Nicholas Cage responsible?
Thank you. It is nearly certain that another populist candidate in addition to RFK, Jr., Trump, will be one way or other, by outright fraud or "justice", prevented from winning.
On a slightly different but related subject -- I believe that suspicions about “Nazi rally” in Canadian parliament are justified. So far, there have been two assertions that may be worth pursuing:
1. Obviously someone trusted organized and brought in the 98-year-old Nazi – he didn’t just drive into parliament. Moreover, apparently there was a reception before standing ovations and he attended that reception.
2. The same Nazi was reportedly introduced in the parliament 16 years ago, in 2007, and that was criticized by Jewish community
The amount of Russophobia created is astonishing and the reason for official hatred of capitalist and peaceful Russia has never been explained.
PS: Worth remembering -- the full name of “temporary” The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 acronym is -- Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act
My favorite funny is Porky Pig. The correlation graphs are hilarious. People are sure gullible . Klaus Schwab song is eerily funny. Have a great weekend.
So, this is the second Biden dog which has bitten people in the White House. I don’t know how many the first dog bit, but we learn now that this one has bitten at least 11 people. How many US citizens would be allowed to get a free pass in such a case? Only one: Biden. He obviously doesn’t give a sh.t about the safety of people in the White House. Demonstrable of the man’s absolute lack of character and fundamental human values. Useless to ask why the MSM is silent.
The dog's behavior - involving two different dogs - suggests problems beyond neglectful pet owners. I can't help but wonder what's going on between Biden and the dog or between Jill and the dog when no one is around.
So the causation behind the correlation between increased temperatures and SUDs is purely a factor of "global warming" and has absolutely nothing to do with the massive amounts of Fentanyl pouring across our wide open southern (non) border and finding it's way into a vast array of products.
Next up, Santa Claus is a real person.
There are no bad dogs. Just bad dog owners.
Wbat'a truly absurd about Commander is that a moderate amoint of training and exercise would probably fix most of the problems. Wirh all the money rhe Bidens stole/extorted, they should easily be able to afford a trainer. Or call Ceasar Milano! How hard is that?!!
The correlation graphs....these would do Fauci and NIH proud!
Angry JB snaps - Dog learns and replicates behavior.
Code of the District of Columbia
Chapter 19. Dangerous Dogs
For the purposes of this chapter, the term:
(A) “Dangerous dog” means any dog that without provocation:
(i) Causes a serious injury to a person or domestic animal; or
(ii) Engages in behavior described in paragraph (4)(A)(i) of this section subsequent to having been determined to be a potentially dangerous dog pursuant to § 8-1902.
(4) (A) “Potentially dangerous dog” means any dog that:
(i) Without provocation, chases or menaces a person or domestic animal in an aggressive manner, causing an injury to a person or domestic animal that is less severe than a serious injury;
(ii) In a menacing manner, approaches without provocation any person or domestic animal as if to attack, or has demonstrated a propensity to attack without provocation or otherwise to endanger the safety of human beings or domestic animals; or
(iii) Is running at-large and has been impounded by an animal control agency 3 or more times in the District within any 12-month period.
(5) “Proper enclosure” means secure confinement indoors or secure confinement outdoors in a locked structure designed and constructed to:(A) Deter escape of the dog; (B) Protect the dog from the elements; and (C) Prevent contact with the dog from humans and other domestic animals.
(6) “Serious injury” means any physical injury that results in broken bones or lacerations requiring multiple sutures or cosmetic surgery.
(Oct. 18, 1988, D.C. Law 7-176, § 2, 35 DCR 4787; Dec. 5, 2008, D.C .Law 17-281, § 105(a), 55 DCR 9186.)
§ 8–1905. Dangerous dog and potentially dangerous dog owner responsibilities.
It shall be unlawful to:
(1) Keep a potentially dangerous or dangerous dog without a valid certificate of registration issued under § 8-1904;
(2) Permit a potentially dangerous dog to be outside a proper enclosure unless the potentially dangerous dog is under the control of a responsible person and restrained by a chain or leash, not exceeding 4 feet in length;
(3) Fail to maintain a dangerous dog exclusively on the owner’s property except for medical treatment or examination. When removed from the owner’s property for medical treatment or examination, the dangerous dog shall be caged or under the control of a responsible person and muzzled and restrained with a chain or leash, not exceeding 4 feet in length. The muzzle shall be made in a manner that will not cause injury to the dangerous dog or interfere with its vision or respiration, but shall prevent it from biting any human being or animal;
(4) Fail to notify the Mayor within 24 hours if a potentially dangerous or dangerous dog is on the loose, is unconfined, has attacked another domestic animal, has attacked a human being, hasdied, has been sold, or has been given away. If the potentially dangerous or dangerous dog has been sold or given away, the owner shall also provide the Mayor with the name, address, and telephone number of the new owner of the potentially dangerous or dangerous dog;
(5) Fail to surrender a potentially dangerous or dangerous dog to the Mayor for safe confinement pending disposition of the case when there is a reason to believe that the potentially dangerous or dangerous dog poses a threat to public safety;
(6) Fail to comply with any special security or care requirements for a potentially dangerous or dangerous dog the Mayor may establish pursuant to § 8-1903; or
(7) Remove a dangerous dog from the District without written permission from the Mayor.
(Oct. 18, 1988, D.C. Law 7-176, § 6, 35 DCR 4787; Dec. 5, 2008, D.C. Law 17-281, § 105(e), 55 DCR 9186.)
§ 8–1906. Penalties.
(a) An owner of a dangerous or potentially dangerous dog who violates the provisions of § 8-1904 or § 8-1905 shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a misdemeanor and be subject to a fine not to exceed $500, imprisonment not to exceed 90 days, or both for a first offense, and a fine not to exceed $1,000, imprisonment not to exceed 90 days, or both for a second or subsequent offense. Prosecutions for violations of § 8-1904 or § 8-1905 pursuant to this subsection shall be brought in the name of the District of Columbia in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia by the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia.
(b) An owner of a potentially dangerous or dangerous dog that causes serious injury to or kills a human being or a domestic animal without provocation shall be fined up to $10,000.
(c) A violation of this chapter shall be a civil infraction for purposes of Chapter 18 of Title 2 Civil fines, penalties, and fees may be imposed as sanctions for any infraction of the provisions of this chapter, or the rules issued under authority of this chapter pursuant to Chapter 18 of Title 2. Adjudication of any infractions shall be pursuant to Chapter 18 of Title 2
(d) The fines set forth in this section shall not be limited by § 22-3571.01.
(Oct. 18, 1988, D.C. Law 7-176, § 7 (a)-(c), 35 DCR 4787; Dec. 5,2008, D.C. Law 17-281, § 105(f), 55 DCR 9186; June 11, 2013, D.C.Law 19-317, § 113(b), 60 DCR 2064.)
Budget: A formula for determining that you need a raise.
Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.
The sanctuary city/defund the police boomerang comic reminded me of this song my father used to sing:
My boomerang won't come back - My boomerang won't come back - I throwed the thing all over the place - Practiced til I was blue in the face - I'm a big disgrace to the Aboriginal race - My boomerang won't come back
Looks like the idiotic liberals don't have this problem. If liberalism is a mental disease...maybe it's caused by them getting hit in the head a few too many times by all those boomerangs...
There is video of Biden kicking his dog while entering the presidential limo. No one covered it except Owen Shroyer of InfoWars.
Interesting that PETA, Humane Society, nor ASPCA seem to care that the Biden family has a pattern of raising dogs that are fear biters, a clear indication of an abusive home.
The comparison studies, oh my gosh! Priceless!
You can almost get that last 'correlation'...
Gosh---Do you think people fall into pools after they watch Nicholas Cage films? I mean in the media, correlation implies causation, right? So maybe they drown themselves after watching the films? Or WHILE watching them? In that case, isn’t Nicholas Cage responsible?
Thank you. It is nearly certain that another populist candidate in addition to RFK, Jr., Trump, will be one way or other, by outright fraud or "justice", prevented from winning.
On a slightly different but related subject -- I believe that suspicions about “Nazi rally” in Canadian parliament are justified. So far, there have been two assertions that may be worth pursuing:
1. Obviously someone trusted organized and brought in the 98-year-old Nazi – he didn’t just drive into parliament. Moreover, apparently there was a reception before standing ovations and he attended that reception.
2. The same Nazi was reportedly introduced in the parliament 16 years ago, in 2007, and that was criticized by Jewish community
The amount of Russophobia created is astonishing and the reason for official hatred of capitalist and peaceful Russia has never been explained.
PS: Worth remembering -- the full name of “temporary” The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 acronym is -- Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act
Those correlation graphs are gold!!! 😂
My favorite funny is Porky Pig. The correlation graphs are hilarious. People are sure gullible . Klaus Schwab song is eerily funny. Have a great weekend.
So, this is the second Biden dog which has bitten people in the White House. I don’t know how many the first dog bit, but we learn now that this one has bitten at least 11 people. How many US citizens would be allowed to get a free pass in such a case? Only one: Biden. He obviously doesn’t give a sh.t about the safety of people in the White House. Demonstrable of the man’s absolute lack of character and fundamental human values. Useless to ask why the MSM is silent.